Do I owe this to my women's college education?

I came across this wonderful article in HBR today about how women tend not to talk in professional situations and at the workplace when in the presence of male colleagues. 

There is of course lots of evidence that this is in fact the case, but I have personally never been one of those women. I've always been happy to speak up even in meetings where I am the only woman amongst 25 men... which has often been the case in my tech career.

Lately I have been wondering whether my comfort with speaking up has something to do with the fact that I went to a women's college. College is the first simulation of a professional environment for most people. In my college (Mount Holyoke) there were no men in class, even in my computer science and discrete math classes. So there was no opportunity for me to second guess my own knowledge in the presence of men as Ms. Johnson describes. I wonder whether this tendency of women not speaking up in male-dominated professional environments is less prominent amongst women's college graduates?

When I went to Mount Holyoke, my decision was based 100% on what school gave me the biggest scholarship grant. I had no intention of seeking out a women's college and I honestly did not appreciate being at a women's college while I was there. It is only now, many many years later, when I come across articles such as this one, or Sheryl Sandberg's TED talk, that I think that perhaps its partly my women's college education that gave me the conviction and confidence I have in myself. 

 

To MBA or not to MBA

I ran across a great article in the Economist today regarding the value of an MBA:
http://www.economist.com/whichmba/think-twice

I couldn't agree more.  Despite having an MBA from a top school, I've never felt that any of my jobs post-MBA benefited from the degree.  This is particularly true in my case, as I already had many years of experience at Microsoft before my MBA and returned to work in Internet / tech companies post MBA.  Had I made a complete career change such as going into banking, perhaps the MBA would have opened more doors for me.  As such, I only leveraged my pre-MBA experience and my own professional network in getting all my post-MBA jobs.  

Rather, I would even go so far as saying that the 2 years I lost to my MBA (in time more than in money) were significantly *detrimental* to my career.  This is probably true for anyone who plans to work in web companies post MBA.  Things move very fast in the valley.  Not just companies but entire industries come and go faster than it takes Harvard to write cases about them.  To name a few: YouTube / Flickr and the user-gen content phenomenon of web 2.0, Apple app store ecosystem, the gaming revolution - mobile and social games, Twitter and its ecosystem.  By the time (if ever) any of these companies or industries get written into business school cases, they will already be irrelevant. 

My advice to anyone considering an MBA is to do it if you want to make a major career change, or have no intention of working in or starting your own venture in tech / internet.  From what I've seen, not only does the valley not reward an MBA, it may actually penalize it.